I’m not sure you can say that my opinions are formed by a video. I’ve owned voyagers 4 times, little phatties about the same as well a as a minitaur, sub phatty, sub 37 and mother 32. Most things made by machine result in superior quality. Quality materials with proper specs and quality control can be accomplished almost anywhere and will result in good products. That’s not to say I don’t care about getting a quality product which is the next arguement I’ll see – robots are very capable of putting together quality products, thats more of a garbage in garbage out thing and has nothing to do with who the people or machines are that assemble something. I don’t really care where or how they’re made – if I did I clearly wouldn’t be using an iPhone like I am to make these comments. I think they are generally overpriced for what they are and there is a big name payup here. To me that’s very much what moog has become “good enough” they have a great name and no doubt their synths make “that sound”. The heart of my point is that this is a market-based economy and other companies seem to be reacting to what competitors are doing and trying to do better, whereas whoever is running moog SEEMS to be out of ideas and settling for good enough. Your average walk-through presets would have been better than what they did. Is the opinion valid if you owned one and used it for a year? My opinion wasn’t based solely on the sound demo – I was just not impressed with the demo given what competitors are putting out for demos. First off I never said the synth wasn’t any good.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |